[On Tuesday, April 13, 2004, a Rutgers undergraduate named Christopher Swasey wrote an op ed that appeared in The Daily Targum]

The Real Rutgers

Christopher Swasey


"Scarlet pride shines despite NIT title loss," (The Home News Tribune, April 2) featured a comment by Rutgers College first-year student Adam Deutsch, from West Orange. "For the first time," Deutsch enthused, "I feel like I'm at a real university."

In isolation, you might make any number of guesses about what had exhilarated Mr. Deutsch. Was it a great class on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics with an inspiring teacher? A lecture on Shakespeare that had allowed him to really understand All's Well That Ends Well? A lecture by David Foster Wallace on the writing he's done since Infinite Jest? A performance of Tom Stoppard's Arcadia in which Rutgers undergraduates showed near-professional talent as actors? A brilliant performance of Bach's "Cello Sonata No. 3" by two student instrumentalists?

As it happens, Mr. Deutsch wasn't talking about any of those things. He was talking about being one of the Rutgers students who went into New York to watch a Rutgers team play at Madison Square Garden. They'd painted their faces, made signs to wave from the stands, and memorized chants to shout at the opposing team. Reports on boosters' Internet boards after the game made it clear the atmosphere was one of barely controlled hooliganism.

One fan proudly announced, "Michigan fans were literally afraid to cheer. The atmosphere definitely had an edge to it, almost like an English soccer match. Last night was awesome." Another reported an incident in which "two RU fans got into at the end of the game," and in which "one RU guy through [sic] a beer at the other RU guy. He missed and wound up drenching a 12-year-old kid."

At sports factory schools, this kind of hooliganism has become all too common. Talking about student riots at schools like Ohio State, West Virginia and the University of Connecticut - where students overturned cars, set fires and broke store windows to "celebrate" football and basketball victories - a University of Maryland official recently said, "It has to sink in with students at some kind of a voluntary level that they're fouling their own nest. If your dominant image of a university is that of a howling, obscene mob, then you're not going to be impressed."

I'm not arguing that the behavior of Rutgers fans at MSG even began to approach the hooliganism of the thousands of students who turned out to set fires and overturn cars in Columbus, Ohio and Storrs, Conn. But I do want to argue that students who come to Rutgers with the notion this is what a "real university" is about are here for the wrong reasons. If they ever come to represent a dominant attitude on campus, Rutgers's stature as an old and distinguished university will be gone forever.

To turn Rutgers into a West Virginia or Ohio State, in other words, all it takes is letting in more and more students like Mr. Deutsch. At that point, real students - the ones who come here with a genuine commitment to academic and intellectual values - will no longer even think of taking the time to apply. We're perilously close to that point right now. In a few more years, when undergraduates are painting their faces for games against the University of South Florida, the University of Louisville, and other opponents in the "new" Big East, and when the campus is swarming with students who share Mr. Deutsch's notion of a "real" university, Rutgers may well have reached the point of no return.

To anyone who cares about Rutgers as a university, Adam Deutsch's comment was depressing enough. But Mr. Deutsch is, after all, only a first-year student. Next year, or the year after, he may take a class in the Nicomachean Ethics that changes his life or see one of his friends in a production of Hamlet that gives him a different idea of what a "real" university is all about.

The Daily Targum, on the other hand - which is supposed to provide a more thoughtful perspective on the purpose of a real university - has no such excuse. After the MSG game, the Targum published an editorial ("Changing tides of U.," April 5) bubbling with optimism about the chance that Rutgers, like West Virginia and Ohio State and Uconn, might someday become a sports factory, filled with students who spend four years painting their faces and howling chants from the stands. On that day, the editorial said, "Rutgers will be a changed place - a place in which [sic] we will proudly be a part." It's true enough Rutgers will be a changed place, but this neglects an important fact. On that day, Rutgers will be a place from which the real students on campus have all transferred to other universities, and where the brightest New Jersey high school kids no longer bother to even apply.

Christopher Swasey is a Livingston College sophomore majoring in pre-business.

Copyright (c) The Daily Targum 4/13/2004

Boosters Respond -- the "writer" Wasn't There!

(From a Rutgers boosters board)

[ posted by "R1766"]

This "writer" throws all the information together and assumes that the student he quoted was talking about the beer throwing or the "intimidation" of the Michigan fans.

If the "writer" was there at the game he would have said so, right? So he is talking about something that he has absolutely no first hand knowledge of.

 So Let's Hear a Word or Two from R1766's Fellow Boosters, Who Were There

  • Exhibit 1) FYI, I was in Sec. 131 behind the basket & 6 scUM fans in the section in front of us started throwing punches at RU fans w/2 mins left. Those scUM fans are classless & it was nice to see that they came out bloody. Thankfully, most UM fans are educayted and much classier, but those guys deserved their beating for throwing punches 1st, especially when they were winning. And yes you are right about the RU guy starting that other fight b/c I was several rows in front of them. Winning is everything & losing sucks! Just win baby! Go RU!

  • Exhibit 2) There was a brawl behind me (227) between 2 drunk RU students...not ugly and quickly separated...the Mich egghead fans were very scared all night...they were literally afraid to cheer...the atmosphere definitely had an edge to it, almost like an english soccer match...we have great fans and last night was awesome...

  • Exhibit 3) no fight around where i sat (318), but there were some spirited fans going back and forth in chanting. before the start of the game, there were many, many chants on "michigan sucks" on the way up to our seats. i saw several RU younger fans giving the middle fingers to the face of the middle-aged michigan fans in the area. michigan fans just walked away. i'm sure this wasn't an isolated event leading up to the game. naturally, these buildups contributed to how all the fans were behaving at the end.

  • Exhibit 4) I was in 212 and caught the end of it as it was right below me. Honestly the RU guy was making quite an arse of himself. Didn't see what started it but most were saying the RU guy started it and he was pretty drunk and out of control. Not trying to flame, just what I saw.

  • Exhibit 5) I heard from a person in school today who was at the game about some sort of fight there last night. Said he saw some guy headbut another right in the face, sounded wild.
  • Exhibit 6) There was also a fight on the 10:03 train back to NB. Anyone know about that?

  • Exhibit 7) at times i stopped listening to the announcers and just listen to the RRRR UUUU throughout the crowd. The crowd was amazing. If people that didnt no rutgers werent impressed today they dont know college basketball. That was one of the craziest crowds ive ever heard
  • Exhibit 8) It didn't end there. At metropark, where I hopped on the train at about 5:00 last night, the poor people on that train did not know what hit them. We filled that train with scarlet and RU chants were started on the train. No standing room. People figured out quickly that RU had a big game at the garden. One passenger who I was standing next to commented that he hopes RU doesn't get too good, because it would make their lives a living hell! I thought that was great. I said, "you better learn to love it." You better learn it love it. SHE BANGS! SHE BANGS!

But look, Rutgers was just playing in some dumb consolation tournament. The university we want to be like is UConn!

(from a post by "RUnumber1" on a Rutgers booster board)

Thank God, The ACC took the wrong team . . .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When the hated ACC decided to conspire with BC for them to leave The BIG EAST Conference and join with their pack of thieves, so that they can have a 12 team league and a championship game in football, they actually took the wrong team.

For reasons unknown, they chose BC over UCONN.

Now, UCONN, still a solid member of The BIG EAST Conference, has Championships in both Men's and Women's Basketball, with the Men beating the ACC's best to win the Championship.

This bodes well for The BIG EAST Conference for years to come.

Thank God the ACC was too stupid and too quick in their greed to stop and think about their moves. Had they chosen UCONN over BC, at least in the near term, I think that the ACC would have had an advantage. Now, they have helped us by giving us a real boost. It is The BIG EAST Conference that has a school as its member which holds the National Championship in both Men's and Women's Basketball!

 But wait a minute! -- Do these students and boosters really want to "be like UConn"?

Isn't there something sort of repulsive about a school where students' idea of college is howling obscenities and starting fights and starting fires and turning over cars?

For an answer, click on the picture just below (the UConn student holding up the "BREAK SHIT" sign). It will give you an idea of what being "just like UConn" would entail for Rutgers --

 Oh, but right, the writer of the Targum op ed, as "R1766" reminds us, wasn't there! And that makes all the difference, right?


"This 'writer' throws all the information together and assumes that the student he quoted was talking about the beer throwing or the 'intimidation' of the Michigan fans.

If the 'writer' was there at the game he would have said so, right? So he is talking about something that he has absolutely no first hand knowledge of."

Mustn't do that, now, must we? Go around talking about something one has absolutely no first-hand knowledge of?

Mustn't go around condemning UConn on the basis of a bunch of pictures put up by their own campus police, right? Or Rutgers on the basis of first-hand accounts by "students" who were there throwing beer at each other, right?

Got to actually be there, right? Throwing a little beer and puking a little bit and setting a car or two on fire one's own self, right?

Or is that only if you're a member of Scarlet R or a drunken "student" or a boosters' board yobbo?

Just thought we'd ask.

Return to Rutgers 1000 home page