When the USS Tunny launched its first Regulus missile on July 15, 1953,
the world entered a new era. Yet the concept of launching missiles or aircraft
from aboard a submarine, it turns out, was far from new. As far back as
WWI, attempts were made to convert submarines into floating aircraft carriers,
and during WWII the Imperial Japanese Navy boasted a fleet of such craft.
Here author Terry Treadwell, the world's pre-eminent expert on submarine-launched
aircraft, shares some of this fascinating history. For more information,
you can purchase his one of his two books on the subject, Submarines
with Wings and Strike from Beneath the Sea. Just click on the
book cover on the right.
SUBMARINE AVIATION 1914-1964
By Terry C. Treadwell
Reprinted with permission from Naval
Aviation News, February, 1983
World War II was brought to the West Coast of the United States early
one morning in September 1942 , when a Japanese I-25 submarine surfaced
about six miles off Cape Blanco, Oregon. Members of the crew scrambled onto
the deck and proceeded to remove from a watertight hangar a small seaplane
a Yokosuka E14Y1 - called a Glen by the Allies. They quickly assembled
the aircraft and hung two incendiary bombs on its under wing racks. The
aircraft normally carried an observer but, due to its attack payload, he
had to be left behind for this mission.
The pilot, Warrant Officer Fujita, took off, penetrated the forest
belt ofOregon and dropped his two bombs causing, it is thought,
some serious fires. A second attack was carried out a week later with similar
results. These attacks showed that it was possible to carry out raids from
submarines, although the range and bomb loads were very restricted.
The
very first aircraft launched from a submarine is attributed to the German
Imperial Navy during WWI. The German Army had advanced into Belgium and
occupied the Port of Zeebrugge, famous for its giant breakwater. The German
Navy then moved its U-boats into the port. One of the first to arrive was
the U-12 commanded by Kapitanleutnant Walter Forstmann. A month later, the
first contingent of the Imperial Navy's Air Service arrived, commanded by
Oberleutnant zur See Friedrich von Arnauld de la Perriere. His unit consisted
of three other officers, 55 enlisted men and two aircraft. The aircraft,
Friedrichshafen FF-29s, were twin-float biplanes, powered by 120-hp engines.
The mission of the U-boats was simple, to sink enemy shipping. However,
the role of the German Navy's air army had still not been clearly defined.
It had been created at the very beginning of the war, but what it could
or should do had yet to be established.
Friedrich
von Arnauld, having received no instructions, decided to develop his own
missions. He reconfigured the unarmed FF -29s to carry 26.5 pound bombs,
and on Christmas Day one of his seaplanes flew across the English Channel,
up the River Thames and dropped the bombs harmlessly on the outskirts of
London. Although it was chased by three British aircraft, it returned safely.
The aircraft themselves suffered more from fuel problems and faulty ignitions
than they did from the British.
Forstmann and van Arnauld decided that if they took an aircraft to sea
on the deck of a submarine and placed it in a takeoff position, they could
launch the plane by partially submerging. This would effectively increase
the range of the seaplanes. On January 6, 1915, the FF -29 was placed across
the deck of the U-12 and lashed down. The submarine left the harbor, seemingly
dwarfed by the 53-foot 2-inch wingspan, that stretched almost one-third
of the submarine's 188-~foot length.
No
sooner had the U-12 left the safety of the breakwater than the captain realized
that the heavy swell they were encountering might possibly endanger the
operation. After less than an hour, it was decided to launch the seaplane.
Captain Forstmann flooded the forward tanks and, despite the pitching of
the vessel, von Arnauld's aircraft floated off the deck and took off without
difficulty. He had intended to rendezvous with the submarine but decided
against it. It is not known how close to the English coast the submarine
was when it launched the FF-29, but von Arnault flew along the Kent coast
undetected and then made his way back to Zebrugge.
The experiment had been partially successful inasmuch as the aircraft
had been carried and floated off, but it was realized that calmer seas and
more secure lashing of the aircraft were required.
Von Arnauld and Forstmann were eager to try the experiment again but
the German High Command vetoed it. The idea lay dormant until 1917, when
it was revived by the High Command so that the striking power of submarines
could be increased. Some of the long-range, cruise type of submarines were
to be equipped with aircraft for scouting purposes. Although plans were
drawn up and designs prepared for the quick assembly and dismantling of
seaplanes on board ship, the ideas were eventually abandoned.
While
the idea was given up by the Germans, in 1927 the British submarine M-2
was commissioned as an aircraft carrier. She was ideal for such an assignment
because of the 12-1nch gun that was housed in a turret forward of the conning
tower.
The gun was removed and the turret modified to take a specially designed
reconnaissance seaplane. Many designs were considered, but the one selected
was a two-seat, unarmed, wireless equipped Peto, designed and constructed
by George Parnall and Company.
The Peto was not the first British aircraft designed for use on a submarine.
In 1916, two Sopwith Schneider seaplanes were carried aboard the E22 submarine,
lashed down on the deck. Even earlier, well before 1914, an aircraft called
the Bristol Burnley X was built. It was designed to collapse and pack away
on surface vessels and on submarines.
The Peto was mated with the ill-fated M-2. The little twin-floated biplane was locked onto a carriage
that rested on two rails inside the hangar o~ the forward deck. The hangar
crew of 10 found the room inside the hangar very cramped when standing by
to get the seaplane launched.
The launch procedure went as follows: The pilot would ascertain from
the captain when the boat was likely to surface. As it was impossible to
start the engine while submerged, the lubricating oil in the tank and engine
was heated up so as to shorten the running-up time once the aircraft was
on the catapult.
As soon as the boat surfaced, the launch crew opened the hangar door
and lowered it to form part of the launching platform. The airplane was
quickly run out on its rails and locked into position at the end of the
catapult, after which the wings were unfolded and locked in position.
The
captain then turned the submarine into the wind and moved at such a speed
as to show sufficient wind on his indicator in the conning tower, which
ensured a safe takeoff. After opening the throttles wide and making sure
that his engine was running correctly, the pilot raised his hand to indicate
that he was ready to take off. The captain gave the order for the catapult
lever to be pulled. The aircraft shot forward, slamming the pilot and his
observer back into their seats, and was launched into the air. After the
seaplane had carried out its objective, it returned to the submarine, landed
and taxied alongside. It was then hoisted back on board by means of a small
lifting crane on top of the hangar. Of course, all of this was possible
only if the weather was calm.
The idea was never a complete success and on the night of January 26,
1933, an announcement from the Admiralty said that the submarine M-2 had
dived at about 1030 hours off Portland, Dorset, and had not been heard of
since. Destroyers and submarines searched the area and later the same night
came the news that an object had been located three miles off Portland;
lying in 17 fathoms on a sandy bottom. Salvage craft and divers were sent
from Portsmouth and it was confirmed that it was indeed the M-2.
After days of frustration, the Peto was recovered from the submarine's
hangar. Badly damaged, she was taken ashore for inspection. She was not
preserved. The salvage work was initially abandoned in September, although
at one point the M-2 was raised to within 18 feet of the surface before
a gale sprang up and the boat sank again. How the accident happened is still
a mystery, but it is probable that the inner hatch to the hangar was open
at the same time that the hangar doors were, perhaps through a misunderstood
order.
While the British were having their problems, across the Atlantic the
American Navy had shifted its interest from submarine aircraft to small
scouting aircraft carried aboard the airships USS Akron and Macon. The U.S.
Navy's interest in submarine aircraft had started way back in 1922. Two
Heinkel-Caspar type U-1 submarine aircraft were received at NAS Anacostia
towards the end of 1922. One was lost during an exhibition flight the following
year and was used for spares for the other. The flight tests were completed
by the end of 1923 and, although the aircraft didn't fly off a submarine,
it did supply useful information for future designs.
The Navy accepted delivery of 12 additional submarine-based aircraft
and, although built by two manufacturers, the design was the same. Six were
constructed by the Cox-Klemin Aircraft Corporation of New York and were
made of wood and fabric. The other six were manufactured by the Glenn Martin
Aircraft Corporation of Baltimore and were largely made of metal. This enabled
the Navy to compare the new techniques using metal rather than wood.
During October and November of 1923, tests with the Glenn Martin MS-1
were carried out aboard USS S-1. The S-1 had a complement of aircraft specialists
from USS Langley aboard. Their duty was to erect and dismantle the aircraft
and stow it away in the pressure-resistant tank aft of the conning tower.
Unfortunately, it took nearly four hours to assemble the aircraft. This
obviously was unacceptable and so modifications had to be made to cut down
the assembly time. The modifications were carried out by the Naval Aircraft
Factory at Philadelphia and, although the aircraft was delivered to them
late in 1923, it was nearly two years before the modifications were completed.
In the summer of 1926, the complete cycle of assembly, launching, recovery
and stowage of the modified Cox-Klemin XS-1, now designated XS-2, was assigned
to the S-1. By the end of October, the launching crew had become so proficient
with the modified aircraft that they could have the machine assembled, launched,
afloat and with engine turning in 12 minutes. It took them only 13 minutes
to recover, dismantle and stowaway, which was a truly remarkable feat when
compared with four hours on the original aircraft. The XS-2 had an effective
scouting radius of approximately 130 miles.
Up to 1931, a number of tiny, foldaway aircraft were designed and submitted
to the Navy, but none were adopted. In 1931, the Navy did purchase a Loening
XSL-1 amphibian for submarine trials, but a number of modifications had
to be carried out to improve its all-around performance. Although it was
tested aboard the S-1, it was not accepted by the submarine service. Many
reasons were given, including one which rumored that Naval Aviators did
not relish the double hazardous duty aboard the old S boats!
The
French had attempted to use aircraft on board submarines but met with very
limited success. Their one and only attempt was on the 2,800 ton Surcouf,
the pride of the French Submarine Services. Built in 1929, Surcouf was the
second largest submarine in the world, the first being the British X-1 at
3,050 tons. A match for many surface warships, Surcouf had twin turret-mounted,
eight-inch guns and formidable torpedo armament. The biggest drawback was
that she was too large and too slow at diving. This meant that she was only
at her best when on convoy duty and when her scout seaplane was ahead looking
for enemy warships and submarines.
Surcouf had its hangar built as an integral part of the conning tower,
and launch and recovery were achieved by using a crane after the submarine
had stopped her engines. Tests continued until 1942 when, on the night of
February 19, Surcouf was involved in a collision with an American freighter
while en route to the Panama Canal. There were no aircraft on board and
there were no survivors.
To go back to the Japanese contribution to the submarine aircraft era,
it all started for them at the end of the First World War. They acquired
seven war-prize U-boats from the German Navy and adopted the best features
into the design of their own submarines. The Japanese had always had great
interest in the use of submarine scouting aircraft and purchased two Heinkel
Caspar U-1 aircraft from the Germans in 1921.
The
first operational trials of the aircraft aboard a submarine did not take
place until 1927 and, as with the American trials, launching operations
were conducted by trimming down the stern and floating the aircraft off.
The Japanese by this time had their own design available, very similar to
the U-1 but with modifications such as a more powerful rotary engine. Although
it was designed in 1925, the aircraft wasn't built until 1927 and operated
from submarine I 21 for about 18 months.
The I 21 was too slow and too small for serious operations, so a larger
boat was selected and, in 1930, the 1,400-ton I 51 had a compressed air
catapult fitted to her after deck together with a hangar capable of taking
two aircraft. Also at this time, the Japanese introduced a new aircraft,
a 6-shi E6Y1 type 91 small reconnaissance seaplane. It was a miniature copy
of the British Parnall Peto and used the same engine, the Mitsubishi Mongoose.
By 1932, eight more models were built by Kawanishi and were known as the
E6Y1-N. After aeroplanes were tested for three years aboard the I 51, the
catapult was removed and the submarine was reassigned to general service.
The early 1930s produced a number of giant submarines based on the design
of the huge German U-142 of 1918. Two of these were built with hangars capable
of taking two aircraft. Two of these were built with hangars capable of
taking two aircraft, a compressed air catapult and a small crane for retrieving
the aircraft. Work was completed on these giant submarines in the mid-thirties,
and later ones were built so that the aircraft could be launched without
the submarine having to stop its engines.
At this time, the Japanese were still at war with the Chinese and these
submarines with their aircraft were used in the China Sea as a deterrent
against Chinese blockade runners. They appear to have been quite successful
and were still in use up to 1941. It was in 1941 that the first submarine-borne
operational monoplane came into service - the E14Y1 or, as it was known
to the Allies, the Glen. It became the eyes of the Japanese submarine fleet
when it set sail to challenge the United States fleet in December 1941.
It carried out reconnaissance over Pearl Harbor before and after the attack.
Other submarines cruised the South Pacific and their aircraft scouted the
harbors of Sydney and Melbourne, Australia, and Hobart, Tasmania. There
were a number of kamikaze-type missions carried out by the Glens
-- long-range reconnaissance flights that gave the pilot no chance of getting
back to his submarine. One example was when submarine I 36 launched her
aircraft from 300 miles off the Hawaiian Islands and, although the pilot
was able to radio back shipping information, it is presumed that he crashed
into the sea and was lost. At the end of 1941, the Japanese had 11 submarines
capable of carrying scouting aircraft and, by the end of 1945, this number
had increased to 27.
Meanwhile in Japan, work was progressing on their secret weapon and kept
so well under wraps that the United States did not find out until after
the Japanese had surrendered. The weapon they had been working on was a
giant submarine, described as I 400 class, an undersea aircraft carrier
with hangar space for three aircraft. It was 400 feet long, displaced 3,900
short tons on the surface and capable of cruising for 31,500 miles without
refueling. Originally, 18 were planned but as the war deteriorated material
shortages caused the plans to be revised and only five were actually started.
By 1945, three had been completed, one was dismantled while still on the
slipway and one was destroyed in an air raid. Of three of the original five
left -- the I 400, I 401 and I 402 -- two were completed as carriers and
one as a supply boat.
Due to the cutbacks of the I 400 class in 1943, smaller, 2,900-ton, I
13 class submarines were converted to carry two aircraft. Of the four converted,
two were completed, while the other two were still undergoing construction
when the war ended. The I 13 class submarines had heavy-duty catapults fitted
on their forward decks, with 12-ton, electric cranes for recovering aircraft.
While the I 400 class submarines were under construction, plans were
made to use the submarines and their aircraft for a raid on the Panama Canal.
The normal scouting aircraft would be of no use, so a light submarine bomber
was needed. The Japanese Navy asked the Aichi Aircraft Company to provide
them with a suitable design. One of the requirements was that the aircraft
could be catapult launched without landing gear. The reason for this was
that the saving in weight would allow for a larger bomb load and a larger
fuel supply. After the raid had been carried out, the aircraft would return
to the submarine, ditch close by, and the crew would be recovered.
Training for the Canal raids did not progress well. The crews practiced
their bombing runs on large scale models of the Canal locks, but were often
interrupted by attacks from U.S. Navy carrier aircraft. The beginning of
July 1945 brought the first submarine flotilla together, consisting of the
I 400, I 401, I 13 and I 14. The task force was equipped with 10 aircraft
and, although the two smaller boats did not have the fuel capacity for the
round trip to Panama, they were to refuel from the bigger boats.
They were provisioned for a four-month cruise but time had run out. They
were diverted to attack Ulithi Atoll where U.S. carriers were anchored.
On July 16, 1945, the task force was attacked by carrier aircraft and the
I 13 was sunk. The other boats did not press home their attack on Ulithi
and all the other submarines were still at sea when the war ended. Not one
of the giant submarines saw action in spite of all the time and money spent
on them.
The post-war progression in the use of submarines in aviation warfare
came when in March 1946 U.S. Navy Secretary James Forrestal approved the
converting of two Gato-class submarines to guided missile launchers. The
submarines that were converted were USS Carbonero (SS337) and USS Cusk (SS348)
. The weapon they were to launch was an improved version of the German V-1
called the Loon. The Loon was later to provide crucial experience and encouragement
in the cruise missile program.
The first launch from Cusk was carried out on February 12, 1941, while
surfaced off Point Mugu, California. This was the first time a submarine had launched
a missile. Earlier tests of the Loon had been carried out at the Naval Air
Missile Test Station at Point Mugu. In these tests, Lockheed P-80 Shooting
Stars had flown alongside the missiles in case they turned off their course
and threatened populated areas. The same idea had been used during WII,
when Spitfires and Hurricanes of the Royal Air Force flew alongside the
German V-1s and turned them around by using their wingtips.
The submarines had a launching ramp installed on the deck behind the
conning tower. The missile was contained in a 10-foot by 30-foot steel,
watertight capsule. When the submarine surfaced, the crew would open the
capsule, assemble the Loon into a firing position, launch it and return
below, leaving the submarine free to submerge. Over the next few years,
many test were undertaken, culminating on May 3, 1950, when Cusk surfaced,
launched a Loon, then tracked and controlled the missile over a range of
105 miles.
The American version of the V-1 disappeared soon afterwards, as the Regulus
submarines came to the fore. These boats, capable of carrying up to five
Regulus cruise missiles, seemed to herald the start of a new form of warfare
(see the main page).
At one time, a series of jet aircraft designs, capable of JATO launch from
a Regulus boat, were put forward. None would ever leave the drawing board
and, when the last Regulus SSG left commission in 1964, the era of the "submarine
with wings" came to a close.
POSTSCRIPT: The "Might Have Beens" of the Modern Era
The presence of the Regulus missile -- essentially a small remote-controlled
plane with a nuclear warhead -- in the fleet led to some interesting proposals. Ed Heinemann of the Douglas Aircraft
Co. demonstrated that a Douglas 640 (top) or a modified A4D Corsair could
fit into a lengthened Regulus missile hangar (center). He also designed
a smaller, jet-propelled seaplane which fit the standard specifications
(top). Either plane would be lifted off the sub's deck by JATO rocket. The
design went nowhere although the compact little craft's lines bear a striking
resemblence to the A-4 Skyhawk leading some to call it "Heinemann's
Hot Rod."
The drawing shown below of the USS Grayback, SSG-574 are of course purely
speculative and come from an article in Mechanic's Illustrated. Grayback
was actually a diesel submarine, not a nuke boat as shown in these drawings
(which seem more likely to have been inspired by the atom-powered USS Halibut).
In this arrangement aircraft would be stowed in a massive sliding-door hangar
and launched either by JATO or, if the sea was calm enough, via ocean takeoff.
Like all other designs, this one had a flaw in that rough seas would make
launch and/or recovery of aircraft difficult.
Experience
in varying sea conditions launching Regulus I and II missiles showed that
launches were possible in foul weather. During an arctic operational readiness
test in the 1950s, a missile aboard USS Tunny dislodged from the launcher
due to heavy seas, causing a JATO misalignment that resulted in loss of
the bird. One can only speculate about the wisdom of launching manned aircraft
in this fashion.
Other bold designs did crop up during the 1960s, including plans to pair
the Convair "Skate" seaplane with a submarine, primarily to extend
the aircraft's range. The Navy also developed a VSTOL aircraft with Grumman
called the "Nutcracker" which could be captured by a boom. The
idea never gained much momentum.
About
the same time, the British designed a "skyhook" for use with their
VTOL Harrier jet. The hook, which operates a bit like the trapeze used aboard
American aircraft-carrying dirigibles of the 1930's, would allow Harriers
to be recovered by surface ships or submarines. The concept has been tested
using a prototype hook on a crane, but no plans for deployment ever developed.
The guided missile and aircraft carrying submarine however is one craft
which the world is certain to see more of in the near future. The U.S. Navy
is on the verge of commissioning several new SSG boats, and the Chinese
(see photo below) and Russians maintain boats capable of launching missiles.
Almost certainly in the future these boats will launch not just missiles,
but remotely-operated-vehicles for surveillance and, perhaps, manned aircraft
for tactical strikes.
Text and photographs copyright Terry C. Treadwell and the Naval Aviation
News. This text and accompanying photos may not be reproduced, reposted
on the internet, published or edited without permission.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Terry C. Treadwell is formerly the European Correspondent for the U.S.
Navy's Naval Aviation News and a frequent contributor to magazines.
He is the author of two books, Submarines with Wings and Strike
from Beneath the Sea, both of which chronicle the use of aircraft and
missiles from submarines. Born in Bournemouth, England, he lived for a short
time in Australia but now lives in his home town.