Welcome to Website Einsteinhoax
To Other Links:-
I:- Purpose of Site:-
H.1- The purpose of this Website is to publish "The Einstein Hoax",
with its earlier rigorously derived sources, "Gravity", and "Corrections to
Special Relativity" included as Appendices. "The Einstein Hoax" is intended for
those who have been suspicious of the premise that reality is so subtle that it
can only be understood in terms of sophisticated abstract mathematics to which
only the elite were privy. The understanding of reality in concrete terms was
presented as being beyond the capability of intelligent individuals. Instead,
reality turns out to be readily understandable in terms of common sense
reasoning once the smoke and mirrors of mathematical obfuscation and the
mathematical and logical errors associated with Special and General Relativity
have been removed. All that is required in an evaluating their reading of these
texts is a good understanding of undergraduate level physics and a passing
familiarity with the meaning of elementary calculus. Those without a basic
grounding in these subjects will have difficulty in evaluating the validity of
the material presented, but they should have little difficulty in following the
concepts. (More patience will be required when reading the appendices since they
are quite rigorous.) The Alice in Wonderland reality of Black Holes,
Singularities, Wormholes, Superstrings, etc. vanishes and, by reverse
engineering, the nature, construction, origin and fate of our Universe becomes
rather obvious. (As the cycles and epicycles of pre-Copernican astronomical
theory demonstrate, General Relativity and the Superstring concept show that any
theory can be made to agree with observation if one adds enough superfluous
degrees of freedom).
H.2- When one corrects two minor errors which still exist in the
mathematics of Special Relativity, as is done rigorously in "Corrections to
Special Relativity" and derives the properties of the gravitational field in a
rigorous manner, as is done in "Gravity" (both included at this Website), all
sorts of completely unexpected results are obtained in terms which are
completely consistent with common sense. These results include the location of
kinetic energy, the nature of mass, the reason for the relativistic effects of
velocity, the source of gravitational energy, the mechanics of the apparent "Big
Bang" origin of the Universe and its subsequent expansion, and even the nature
of matter and the source of the forces between particles. The likelihood of the
results which are provided being wrong are vanishingly small. Unlike the
mathematical reasoning typically used by theoretical physicists, which has the
unfortunate characteristic that the probability of error increases with the
number of steps, the probability of error when common sense
methods are applied in a disciplined and self consistent manner decreases as the
number of steps and factors involved increases. It is impossible to
complete a jigsaw puzzle incorrectly.
H.3- In your reading of the material presented, the author asks you
not to take his word or the word of anyone else for anything. Instead, he asks
that you check the material presented with your own knowledge, intelligence, and
common sense. The only background required to allow you to check its validity is
an understanding of College Level Freshman Physics and a familiarity with the
principles of Elementary Calculus. Please do not accept the fiction that the
subject matter can only be understood by highly educated individuals in terms of
abstract mathematics. When an expert cannot make himself understood by an
intelligent and motivated layman, it invariably means that the expert does not
understand his subject! The author hopes that the material presented
passes this test. He can only guarantee, however, that he has done his homework
and that the material presented has been developed with extreme
care.
II:- Summary of "The Einstein Hoax"
Chapter Titles
- Introduction
- Historical Background
- The Nature of the Einstein Hoax
- Does the Aether Exist?
- The Resurrection of Absolute Velocity by Quantum Experiments
- The Nature of Reality
- Applying the Lorentz Transformations Properly
- Generating the Gravity Transformations
- Dr. Einstein's Error and the Introduction of Curved Space
- Gravitational Contraction and Collapse
- Gravitational Collapse and the Creation of a Universe
- The Space Time Continuum
- The Nature of Particles
- Adding Quantum Effects to Our Understanding
- Changing the Paradigms
- What Can We Conclude?
There are 57,000 words and 53
illustrations.
S.1- Summary:- In the 19th Century, it was considered axiomatic that
all of Nature was the result of the action of various mechanisms, mechanical,
electromagnetic, and perhaps others which were yet to be recognized. Lord
Raleigh was reported to have asserted that there was no phenomena in Nature for
which a model could not be built. It was considered the physicists job to employ
an iterative process which consisted of constructing that model, analyzing its
behavior using appropriate mathematical techniques, and verifying the validity
of the model and the mathematics by experimentation. Under that philosophy, 19th
century physicists had concluded that light was a transverse vibration
propagating through a rigid medium named the Aether. However, when attempts were
made to measure the effect on the observed velocity of light resulting from the
variation in the velocity of the Earth in its orbit, the experiments yielded a
null result.
S.2- By 1903, the recognition by Fitzgerald that matter contracts in
the direction of the velocity vector, the recognition by Larmor that clocks ran
slower as a result of velocity, and the derivation by Lorentz of the Lorentz
Contraction for Mass (based on Thomson's derivation of
E=MC2 in 1888), led to the Lorentz
Contraction-Aether (Aether Relativity) Theory. This theory resolved
the dilemma. It demonstrated that all attempts to measure our velocity with
respect to the Aether by conventional means would yield a null result. The
reasons for the null result became intuitively understandable once quantum
physicists had demonstrated that the forces between particles were
electromagnetic in nature. At the time, the only apparent weakness of Aether
Relativity was that it did not explain the effects of velocity on electric and
magnetic phenomena. When 19th Century Dimensional Analysis is used to derive
Lorentz Transformations for those effects, the apparent defect in the Aether
Theory disappears, and it is found to satisfy the criteria demanded by 19th
Century science.
S.3- Two years later, in 1905, an obscure patent clerk possessing a
Ph.D. in physics, apparently sensing an opportunity represented by the then
apparent inability of the Aether Relativity Theory to explain electromagnetic
phenomena, published the Special Theory of Relativity. In deriving this theory
he applied mathematical techniques to Poincare's Principle of Relativity. Upon
examination, Special Relativity is found to be identical to the Aether
Relativity Theory with the conceptual restraint imposed by a preferred velocity
reference frame (the Aether) removed. Since, under both theories, an observer
could not measure his velocity with respect to that preferred reference frame by
techniques known at the time, the academic community asserted that the concept
of the Aether was meaningless. It then took the unscientific step of demanding
that the Aether concept was not to be used as a basis for further work in
the physical sciences even though its usage could produce no adverse
effect. (To his credit, Dr. Einstein warned that it had not been proven that the
Aether didn't exist, it had only been proven that it wasn't needed in physical
theories.) It should be noted that, unlike the Aether Relativity Theory, Special
Relativity Theory did not resolve the alleged electromagnetic limitations of the
Aether Relativity Theory, it arbitrarily defined them as
non-existent!
S.4- While the Aether Relativity Theory was consistent with common
sense and allowed Lord Raleigh's model to be constructed, the Special Theory of
Relativity contradicted that common sense and made it impossible to construct an
equivalent model. To individuals with a strong sense of reality, Special
Relativity lead to unanswerable questions. (e.g.- If light consists of particles
traveling ballistically through empty space rather than vibrations traveling
though a medium [the Aether], how does it manage to maintain a velocity which is
independent of the velocity of its source without relying upon some form of
magic?- Chapter 4). Instead of recognizing such questions as problems inherent
in Special Relativity, relativists responded with assertions that they were
indicative of the brilliance of Dr. Einstein's work and the questioner should
not feel bad about them because there were only a few minds in the world capable
of understanding that work. This was probably true, but not because of Dr.
Einstein's brilliance, it was because Special Relativity only worked if one
avoided asking embarrassing questions. Over the years, if any student working
towards an advanced degree in physics persisted in asking the questions asked in
Chapter 4, he would have been dismissed as not having the mental capacity to
understand the subject matter. Recently, however, the situation has changed.
High altitude observations of the radiation background of space (Par. 4.17) have
shown that an absolute velocity reference (the Aether) must exist. Furthermore,
experiments in quantum physics (Chapter 5) have shown how our velocity with
respect to that velocity reference could be measured. The fact that such
measurements are possible demonstrates that Special Relativity's interpretation
of reality is deficient. The Aether Relativity Theory, on the other hand,
provides the same mathematical predictions as Special Relativity in a manner
which is consistent with the requirements of a Raleigh type of model.
S.5- Since Aether Relativity was provided two years before Special
Relativity, one must ask the question as to why Dr. Einstein's work was
considered to be more than a refinement of existing theory rather than a
profound new insight. The answer would seem to lie in the political goals of the
scientific community. Dr. Einstein achieved his results through a mathematical
derivation rather than through the physical insight employed by Fitzgerald.
Mathematics has a property not possessed by insightful reasoning. Mathematics
can be taught by rote and, since almost anyone can learn by rote without
actually having to understand the subject matter, the cadre of physical
scientists could be readily expanded. It appeared that progress could be made by
combining mathematics with experiment without the need for generating a
conceptual model of the phenomena under study. It became vital, therefore to
suppress the Aether Relativity concept so that the fiction that the combination
of mathematics and experiment were sufficient to achieve progress could be
established and maintained.
S.6- Spurred on by his success with Special Relativity, Dr. Einstein
went on to derive General Relativity by combining the Principle of Equivalence
(between inertial and gravitational masses) and the Principle of Relativity.
Without the inherent safety net which would have been provided by the inclusion
of a Raleigh type of model, Dr. Einstein's failed to recognize that the physical
significance of the relativity phenomena prohibited the use of Tensor Calculus
for such a purpose and used that technique to derive his new theory. He
struggled for about 18 months before revising his approach. Instead of
eliminating the mathematical error implicit in his use of Tensor Calculus, he
added another degree of freedom by using the incomplete geometry of Riemann and
allowing space to be curved. (This geometry lacks the requirement that parallel
lines never meet and as such is a subset of conventional Euclidian geometry. A
typical example is the two dimensional non-Euclidian geometry of the surface of
the three dimensional Earth.)
S.7- Unfortunately there is enough truth in his results to have
allowed him to predict the observable effects of the Sun's field on the
precession of Mercury's orbit, the bending of the path of light, and the slowing
of clocks. The observations which supposedly verified General Relativity were,
and still are, about a million times too crude to reveal its residual errors. As
a gravitational theory, General Relativity is a failure. It cannot account for
the force which holds you to your chair or the energy which gravity will apply
to you if you fall. (If one falls out of a window, he couldn't care less about
the precession of Mercury's orbit, he cares about the results of the force of
gravity.) Even though Dr. Einstein was reported to have been uneasy about the
extension of General Relativity to extremely strong fields, that extension has
been made to include gravitational collapse and has led to the concepts of Black
Holes, Singularities, Wormholes, the inate inconsistency betweeen Quantum theory
and General Relativity, etc. The existence of these conclusions should have
caused a reexamination of the basic theory instead of blind acceptance.
S.8- The text of "The Einstein Hoax" removes the mystery behind
Special Relativity by demonstrating the "how" and "why" of the effects involved
and shows that experiments already conducted by quantum physicists have proven
not only that the Aether is real but that our absolute velocity through space is
readily measurable. It is Aether Relativity which represents reality. The text
then continues and develops gravitational transformations equivalent to the
Lorentz Transformations which allow the reader to visualize what the
gravitational field is all about; the source of its energy; a demonstration that
the idea of curved space is merely an artifice introduced by Dr. Einstein's to
partially overcome his error in using Tensor Calculus; and the source of the
pressure which causes the gravitational collapse of an object to cease before it
becomes a Black Hole. As a bonus unexpected by the author, these gravitational
transformations show how our Universe was created; lead to the observed
cosmology; show that the expansion of our Universe will continue forever; and
demonstrate that every object which undergoes gravitational collapse eventually
becomes another universe as rich as our own. The nature of space and time is
discussed followed by a description of the nature of matter and the manner in
which Planck's Constant insures that the three quarks which constitute a nucleon
are fundamental and contain no smaller structure. (The zoo of high energy
particles created by particle accelerator experiments can only be temporary
products produced from the kinetic energy added to the colliding particles
during the experiment since it is the only source of energy available to produce
collision products which are greater than the rest mass energy of two nucleons.)
Other than providing an insight into the nature of the Aether, the author
suspects these "noise" products have no significance. The previously written
texts, "Gravity" and "Corrections to Special Relativty", are rigorous
derivations of the material presented in "The Einstein Hoax" are presented as
appendices for backup. Unlike "The Einstein Hoax", these texts are written for
those having an undergraduate understanding of Physics and Elementary Calculus
and their rigor does require more patience.
S.9- The author accepts the possibility that the concepts presented
may be wrong, however he finds it extremely difficult to accept that they are as
defective as the concepts which are presently held. The material presented not
only passes the tests of experiment and mathematical verification, it passes the
test of Lord Raleigh that it is in accordance with a single self-consistent
model. The fact that the material presented passes the Raleigh test provides the
author with a great deal of confidence. Unlike a mathematical solution in which
the probability of error increases with the number of steps, the probability of
error in a Raleigh Model decreases with its complexity. Remember, it is
impossible to complete a jigsaw puzzle incorrectly.
III:- Summary of the "Gravity" text.
Chapter Titles
- Introduction
- Laying the Groundwork
- Evaluating the Gravitational Conversion Factors
- Comparison with the "Real World"
- The Complete Gravitational Field
There are 50,000 words and 22 diagrams.
G1:- Being dissatisfied with the published treatments of the
gravitational phenomena and recognizing that gravity was a relativistic
phenomena, the author began decades ago to study the subject carefully. It
seemed obvious to him that the phenomena described by the Lorentz
Transformations of Special Relativity and the time dilation of General
Relativity described effects in which the measuring instruments by which
observations were being made were susceptible to being altered by the phenomena
being investigated. To deal with this possibility and determine what was
actually occurring (as would be observed by "godlike" instruments which were
unchanged), the author elected to use the techniques of Dimensional Analysis.
G2:- Investigation of the treatment of gravitation provided by General
Relativity reveals several basic defects:-
- The time dilation expression it provides is not multiplicatively
commutative and therefore is in conflict with one of its basic postulates, the
Principle of Relativity. As a result, the predictions made by General
Relativity must be grossly in error in strong fields such as exist around
neutron stars. This error is undetectable within the extremely weak field of
the Solar System.
- The curved space predicted by General Relativity would allow a perpetual
motion machine of the first kind to be constructed in principle.
- General Relativity leads to a singularity at its end limit.
- General Relativity fails to account for the energy of fall and concludes
that the gravitational field is able to 'create' energy.
- General Relativity leads to conclusions which are in conflict with its
other basic postulate, the Principle of Equivalence.
G3:- These deficiencies do not result from a failure of the Principles
of Relativity and of Equivalence in combination. They result from a
misapplication both of the Principle of Equivalence and of the Tensor Calculus
used in the derivation of General Relativity. When the misapplication of the
Principle of Equivalence is corrected and the use of Tensor Calculus is avoided,
the combination of the Principle of Equivalence and the Principle of Relativity
is found to yield the same results as derived in the approach taken in this
discussion.
G4:- By combining the Principle of Relativity with Dimensional
Analysis, a treatment of the gravitational field has been developed which is
both internally consistent and which is consistent with the results of all
observations and with all currently accepted 'physical laws'. Unlike General
Relativity, the concepts presented meet the following criteria:
- Consistent with accepted physical laws.
- Consistent with observations.
- All dilations are multiplicatively commutative.
- Source of gravitational energy is revealed.
- Energy is conserved in the absolute sense.
- Gravitational collapse is self limiting.
- Conclusions suggest observed cosmology.
- Conclusions are compatible with both the Principle of Relativity and the
Principle of Equivalence.
IV:- Summary of the "Corrections to Special Relativity"
text.
Section Titles
- Introduction.
- A Comparison of the Velocity Difference Between Velocity Reference Frames
'B' and 'C' as Observed in Reference Frame 'B' and as Observed in Reference
Frame 'A'.
- Determination of the Lorentz Transformation for Incremental Mass and for
Force Between Reference Frames Having Relative Velocity.
- The Balance of Moments Applied to a Right Angle Lever in Velocity
Reference Frame 'B' Moving with Velocity, V, with Respect to Velocity
Reference Frame 'A' as Observed in Reverence Frames 'A' and 'B'.
- The Conventional and Revised Lorentz Transformations for Transverse Force
as Related to the Right Angle Lever Thought Experiment.
- The Lorentz Transformation for Parallel and Transverse force as Related to
a Compressed Spring Thought Experiment.
R1:- Summary:- This paper derives the Lorentz Transformations for
force parallel to and transverse to the relative velocity vector between
velocity reference frames. In the process it demonstrates that both the accepted
Lorentz Transformation for Force in the transverse direction and the current
interpretation of the Right Angle Lever Thought Experiment, as described in many
texts, are incorrect. A final result is the determination of the manner in which
the kinetic energy associated with a moving object (particle) is stored. Finally
it is shown that the reason it is considered that Special Relativity is not
valid for accelerated reference frames is that it defines mass in different
terms than those commonly used in mechanics. The difficulty with acceleration in
Special Relativity vanishes when the non-relativistic definition of mass is
used, namely that inertial mass is the incremental impulse required to produce
an incremental change in velocity.
V:- Considerations in Presenting "The Einstein Hoax"
P.1- The Use of a Pseudonym:- The author apologizes for using the
pseudonym, H. E. Retic, in publishing "The Einstein Hoax" rather than his own
name. This step was taken at the request of the author's family as a buffer
against crank responses which may occur as a consequence of the material
presented. The author will, however, respond directly to E-mail addressed to
Einsteinhoax@aol.com
P.2- The Presentation of Diagrams and Tables:- To facilitate both the
reading of the texts on the screen and to the printing of them as 8.5x11 inch
hardcopy, the texts of "The Einstein Hoax", "Gravity", and Corrections to
Special Relativity" are presented in two forms. In the form needed for the
printing of hardcopy, each Chapter is presented as a separate webpage without
diagrams but with anchors within the text provide screen access to the
appropriate figures by "clicking" on the Figure designation. (Return to the text
is accomplished by "clicking" the BACK button). This is step is taken because
the HTML protocol does not provide for "page break" commands, and as a result,
if one attempted to provide the entire text in a single step, many of the
diagrams would be split between two printed pages. Access to the entire book is
accomplished by clicking "NEXT" at the end of each page. Printing is
accomplished is by the PRINT command as each of these webpages is accessed.
The second form is setup for screen read and provides the complete text along
with its embedded figures. This version may be printed, but many of the diagrams
will be split between the pages.
P.3- Making The Texts Compatible With the HTML Language:-
- The lack of the HTML "no-break" function in some browsers may cause
expressions containing subscripts, superscripts, and certain symbols to be
split between two lines when the sense of the text requires that they be on
the same line. This limitation does not occur in Netscape and late (1998)
versions of Microsoft’s Explorer. The necessary "no-break" commands have been
included in the text, and if your browser supports the function, all such
expressions will appear on the same line of text.
- In the texts, the following considerations apply:
- A single "*" represents a multiplication.
- While it might seem desirable to employ non-ASCII symbols as done in the
original text, the author has no assurance that they will reproduce properly
on all browsers. Accordingly, where necessary conventional keyboard symbols
are substituted for the non-ASCII symbols.
- In order to insure proper printing of the diagrams at the end of each
chapter, it is recommended that the printer margins be set at 0.5 inches at
the top, right side and bottom and att 1.0 inches at the left side to facillitate binding in a three hole notebook. It is also recommended that the HTML printed page designator functions for filename, date, time, and page number, which normally appear at the extreme corners of each printed page, be turned off since they are not consistent with the "multipage"
printing of a complete book. To by-pass the need for individual page numbers,
each paragraph is numbered both as to chapter and paragraph number. Printed
files should be suitable for binding in a three hole binder.
P.4- The author had hoped that the HTML language employed on the World
Wide Web would include the "batch file" and the "form feed" functions which are
common to older systems. With these functions it would have been possible for
the entire book to be accessed and printed with a single command, diagrams
placed in their optimum locations, and conventional book page numbers to have
been provided. The author regrets the inconvenience that the lack of these
functions entails. An inclusion of a "FORMFEED" command into the HTML protocol
to cause the printer to form feed would also have allowed the presentation and
printing of these texts with a single command.
The presentation of a text containing Tables and/or Figures is compromised by the capability of browsers to allow the user to vary the size of the presentation from an agreed upon standard. As a result, it is necessary to incorporate "page break" commands within the text so that embedded tables and diagrams will not split between two separate printed pades. This will have no effect on texts read directly from the screen but will cause some of the printed pages to contain a blank space at their end to allow the tables and/or diagrams to start at the top of the nect page. Ir is recommended that the printer margins be set at 0.75 inches at the top, right and bottom and at 1.0 inches at the left. Your browser's text size should be initially set at MEDIUM. To test for a suitable printed page size access Print Size Test Page. If printing does not fill page properly, try adjusting the top and bottom margins. To copy text and diagrams to a file "Save As" "Complete HTML Text File".
5.6- The files being read from the Website may be transfered to a folder
on your computer by saving as Internet HTM files.
To Other Links:-