- Overview
- .

American abortion law is a rather complex scene and
understanding it requires an adequate grasp of the American court
system, the system of federalism, the theory of the separation of powers and especially the doctrine of judicial review.
Abortion law in the United States emanates from two basic
governmental sources: (1) the legislatures of the several states and territories and (2)
the United States (i.e., the "federal") Supreme Court. The state legislatures,
being responsible for the production of most criminal laws, are the traditional source of
abortion regulation. Thus, from the decline of common law (judicially created) crimes in
the early 19th century, to the intervention of the United States (federal) Supreme Court
in the 1970s, state legislatures widely criminalized abortion. In 1973, in the
landmark case of Roe vs. Wade, the United States
Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provided a fundamental right for women
to obtain abortions. The Supreme Court held that the "right to privacy,"
established by the Courts precedents in the contraception
cases of the 1960s and early 70s, assured the freedom of a person to abort
unless the state had a "compelling interest" in preventing the abortion. The
Court then held that, though the state had an interest in protecting fetal life, this
interest did not become "compelling" (i.e. adequate to allow banning an
abortion) until fetal viability occurred in the third trimester of pregnancy. Thus, all
the state abortion laws that regulated abortion during the first six months of pregnancy
(except for the purpose of protecting maternal health during the second trimester) were
invalidated.
What this means is that before Roe v. Wade in 1973, the
legality of abortion essentially rested with the legislatures of the several states. However, in 1973, the Supreme Court made it an issue of
federal constitutional law by holding that abortion was a
constitutional right. From then on, whether abortion was legal or not depended on the
Supreme Courts decisions as to how broad the Roe right to abortion actually
was. State legislatures continue to have a say only in the little room the Court has left
outside the scope of the abortion right.
However, with Webster in 1989
and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, the Supreme
Court expanded this room, allowing the states that want to regulate abortion substantially
more latitude to do so. Since 1992, elective abortions can be banned after actual
viability (c. 20-22 weeks), and pre-viability regulations only have to meet the new
"undue burden" standard, meaning that a "compelling" state interest is
not required so long as the law does not present a "substantial obstacle" to
obtaining an abortion.
The main focus of this Supreme Court litigation is the conflict
between various states that want to make laws either protecting women or the unborn, and
abortion rights advocates who want as little government restraint upon the abortion option
as possible. The state will argue that there is no constitutional right to abortion, or if
there is a right that it is not violated by the law the state wants to enforce. The
abortion rights advocates argue that Roe v. Wade rightly protected a fundamental
human right and that it must not be eroded by politics.
There are other players, however. The United States Congress can pass
at least some abortion regulations--but hardly ever does so. Its legislation is subject to
the same constitutional scrutiny as state laws. It must also be remembered that each state
has its own state constitution and its set of state constitutional rights. Though these
rights cannot operate in derogation of federal constitutional rights, they can provide
rights that are not in the federal constitution. Thus, a state supreme court can have its
own version of "Roe v. Wade," finding an independent right to abortion in
that states own constitution.
The Process since 1973.
Supreme Court cases (like Roe and Casey) generally get
started when someone, usually an interested organization (e.g., Planned Parenthood) or
someone backed by one, brings a law suit in federal court to enjoin the enforcement of a
particular state law, claiming that it violates some provision of the U.S. (federal)
Constitution. They sue the state (often through some official, like Dallas District
Attorney Henry Wade in Roe v. Wade or Pennsylvania Governor Robert Casey on Planned
Parenthood v. Casey). It begins in a U.S. (federal) District Court in the state in
question, where one side wins and the other invariably appeals. The case goes on to the
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (the intermediate appellate court) for the particular
federal circuit the state is in. There a panel of judges will "affirm" or
"reverse" the decision of the district court below and the loser will petition
the United States Supreme Court to hear the case. If the Court refuses then the decision
of the circuit court will stand and will be binding law within that circuit. If the Court
agrees (by a vote of four) to take the case then the nine-member Court will decide whether
it agrees with how the circuit court ruled or not. Whether the Supreme Court strikes down
the law or not, its decision as to what the Constitution says will bind every other court
in the country, state or federal.
[N.B. This is not always how it goes--Roe
v. Wade, for example, came directly up from the district
court, which is very unusual. Some cases come out of a state court system after a
party lost in that states supreme court. Also, the federal appellate procedures have
changed over the years. Very few cases come to the Supreme Court via conventional
appeal any more. Most are now brought as petitions for a writ of certiorari, which
are purely "discretionary," so that the busy Court can take only those few cases
they think are important.]
[The United States Supreme Court is the final arbiter of so-called
"federal issues," which include interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.]

Back to the Abortion Law Homepage