Agnès Varda | Cléo de 5 à 7 | Le Bonheur | Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond | Jacquot de Nantes | L'Univers de Jacques Demy / The World of Jacques Demy | Les Glaneurs et la glaneuse | Deux ans après / Two Years Later
Classic Film and Television Home Page
Agnès Varda is a French filmmaker who has been making movies since the 1950's. She is the subject of the scholarly book Agnès Varda (1998) by Alison Smith.
One can see the influence of Varda on a film like Chacun cherche son chat / When the Cat's Away (Cédric Klapisch, 1996). This film is partly fiction, partly documentary, depicting a Parisian neighborhood in detail, as in Varda's Cléo de 5 à 7. There are a number of mirror reflections in shop windows, as in that Varda movie. And it has the beautiful, neon colors of such Varda films as Le Bonheur.
Cléo de 5 à 7 (1961). The title here is a bit naughty. In turn of the century France, sophisticated Parisians who were carrying on torrid affairs would make appointments with each other from five to seven PM, to pursue their romance. Such trysts were so standard that they became known as "cinq à sept"s, from the French words for "5 to 7". Unfortunately, poor Cléo here is not getting anything like this. Her time is being spent sweating out the results of her medical tests, not finding romance.
Cléo is a pop singer, and we see her meeting with a composer. Later, both The Gleaners and I and its sequel Two Years Later will include rap singers, in segments that are essentially music videos.
Le Bonheur (1965) is a very disturbing film about domestic life. Even before it ends in tragedy, it is extremely creepy and gut wrenching. Watching it is unpleasant, and definitely not recommended. It is not so much that the film is poorly made - it is very well done. Rather, it is just plain difficult to watch. This is all unfortunate, become some of the scenes show an outstanding sense of color and visual style. If one can ignore the creepy plot, and just watch the photography, some of the scenes are quite impressive.
Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond (1985) is a fiction film, about a woman who wanders tramp-like through the South of France. The film has ties to other Varda works. The film recalls Cléo de 5 à 7: both are films about a woman in crisis, who wanders through an area of France (Paris in Cléo de 5 à 7, the countryside around Nîmes here), while contemplating the problems in her life. Both films are full of shots of mirrors, which tend to be far more cloudy and less reflective in this later work. The film also looks forward to The Gleaners and I, in its documentary like look at life and agriculture in the countryside. Varda is deeply interested in the science and engineering involved with agriculture and food production in both films. The scientist character here, Prof. Landrier, is one of the most realistic and detailed looks at a scientist in recent fictional films.
Varda has links to Neorealism. Like the Neorealists, she often shows the lives of non-wealthy people, including their work activities. She also includes much about science, technology and industry, also like the Neorealists. While the people in Varda's film are financially of modest means, they tend not to be "typical" or "ordinary". Instead, their positions in society, jobs, and personal technical skills tend to be highly individualized.
Sans toit ni loi also recalls Robert Bresson's Au Hasard, Balthazar (1966). Both films are structured around a central character; both protagonists keep encountering a series of other people in the backgrounds on the films, whose developing stories we also follow. Both films are set in the French countryside, and offer a great diversity of different kinds of country life and activities. Both films focus relentlessly on human corruption, failings and cruelty, offering a dark picture of tragedy due to dreadful human weaknesses and moral failings. Varda's work is more systematically feminist than Bresson's, although Bresson has his feminist moments, too. Bresson's donkey hero is more purely innocent than Varda's human wanderer, who has a full share of faults of her own. Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond has shots of goats, just as Bresson's film was full of sheep and the donkey. The goats here, and the farmers who raise them, form an image of decency in Varda's film that is an alternative to the corruption around them.
Like The Gleaners and I, this film is full of shots of fields. Varda gets compositional mileage out of the rows of plants in the fields, which often stretch in straight lines through the frame. The plants themselves are prominently featured, especially grape vines (Vitis) and plane trees (Plantanus). The care of these two plants forms a major part of the plot of the film. The Gleaners and I also focuses on food plants, plants that are of positive benefit to humanity. By contrast, much of Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond looks at grapes and wine making. The heroine and most of the people she meets are obsessed with smoking, wine, alcohol and drugs. As the goat farmer she meets warns, the road people here are on a terrible downward spiral leading to alcoholism. This is a look at a very dark industry, that of wine production, and Varda shows alcohol's hellish consequences for humanity. The wine festival that concludes the film leads directly to the heroine's death. It has a nightmarish quality. The telephone booth attack at the wine festival here recalls the attack on Tippi Hedren in the phone booth in Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds (1963). Varda's finale is one of cinema's most terrifying scenes.
Later, in The Gleaners and I, Varda will interview a man whose life has been ruined by alcoholism. This will occur shortly before the segment of her film on the wine country. That film's sequel, Two Years Later, will extend and deepen this examination.
Both films include looks at fungi, treated as an image of sinister decay. In Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond, this is the fungus that attacks the plane trees; in The Gleaners and I, it is the dry rot that is attacking Varda's house.
Varda is full of interest in the local buildings here, especially those associated with agriculture.
While The Gleaners and I takes place in a lush harvest season, and features bright colors, this film is set in winter. Varda adjusts her palette to concentrate on hues that have a lot of white mixed in with them. This gives a consistently white, pale and winter like aspect to the color harmonies of this film. As usual with Varda, the colors are planned out to the smallest detail.
The film shows Varda's interest in walls. These walls tend to be brilliantly colored, colors which greatly contribute to the color schemes of the shots as a whole. The walls also tend to be textured. Outdoor walls can be full of ribbing, or topped with ornamentation. One can feel their rich surface texture. Indoor walls tend to be covered here with elaborate wall papers, also contributing color, form and texture to the shots. Sternberg and his disciple Mizoguchi also frequently employed rich wall patterns in their films, but unlike Varda, they only rarely had a chance to work in color. Varda often shoots walls straight on, so that the wall is parallel to the plane of the shot. This film is full of lateral tracking shots along the walls, which tend to move from right to left here. Varda also includes pans that resemble lateral tracks - she is quite willing to settle for a simpler-to-set-up panning shot, if it keeps almost parallel to a wall, and resembles a lateral track.
Varda's compositions often contrast triangles, with strong verticals and horizontals. The triangles are lying flat on their longest side, with diagonal lines rising up to a peak above. The first shot of the film has some triangular mounds in it. Throughout the film, such triangles are formed by:
and by other structures as well. Such triangles and their diagonal lines are almost always contrasted in the frame by a series of strong verticals and horizontals. Often times, the triangles are in one region of the frame, the verticals and horizontals in another. There is even a triangle combined with a circle on the back of a man's leather jacket.
Some complex shots in the film have a recursive quality. When we see a long shot of the heroine standing on a bridge, there are a series of vertical/straight line combinations, each nested inside the other. The outermost one consists of the bridge and a pole on the left of the screen. Within this, in the lower right corner of the screen, is a nested series of power lines. Each one is framed within the bigger one wrapped around it. They are all nested within each other list a series of Russian dolls. Such a recursive effect is dazzling on the screen. The lower left corner has a series of contrasting triangles, created by buildings. These form a visually fascinating contrast, creating a balance on the screen between two kinds of visual shapes.
Another recursively composed shot: the view of the elderly Lydie, through a series of doors. The shot is full of furniture with spiraling borders: a most unusual and complex shape. The dark spirals in the wood are near green door frames. One combination of green door frame with wooden spirals close inside in turn contains another green door frame with wooden spirals within it. The effect is complex and dazzling: green, spiral, space, green, spiral, space, Lydie.
Even when the frame is not recursively composed, Varda likes to include repeated structures and objects within the frame. If there is one arched hut in the vine field, there will be at least two. It there is one hill or tree in a shot, there might be a second one. The opening shot contrast a big tree with a little tree beside it. Such a change of scale is frequently seen in Varda's repeating structures and objects. They tend to be of all different sizes. This is different from Robert Mulligan, a director who also likes repeating architectural elements; Mulligan's all tend to be of the same size. The repeating patterns in Varda's wallpapers also add to this effect. Frequently there are just not two or three repeating objects in a frame; there might be dozens, which Varda has grouped into some interesting geometric pattern.
Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond (1985) was shot in the middle of the 1980's era of MTV, punk-inspired fashion. Like Richard Tuggle's Out of Bounds (1986), it forms a record of the fashions that were popular among young people of the era. Both films have a glamorous but slightly menacing man in black leather pants. Varda also includes the Mohawk-inspired hair styles for men, and painted leather jackets. This side of the film is especially featured in the bus terminal sequence. The boyfriend at the chateau also wears the skinny tie and brightly colored sports jacket that were big at the time. Cléo de 5 à 7 was full of the female fashions of the era, including a trip to a hat shop. Here it is the spectacular men's clothes of the 80's that get center stage. Later, in Two Years Later, Varda will include a woman singer at a festival in a spectacularly colored green wig.
Jacquot de Nantes (1990) is Varda's tribute to her late husband, Jacques Demy. It tells the story of Demy's childhood and youth, and how he grew up to be a filmmaker.
The shots of the Guignol theater are some of Varda's classic triangles: the bright red theater has a step-wise triangular roof. These are linked to both the green nature backgrounds Varda likes, and camera movement.
The inside of the theater's puppet stage in the "Donkey Skin" puppet show, is a recursively composed perspective. Varda tracks out on this, showing repeated columns nested inside each other.
Varda also made a documentary about Demy, L'Univers de Jacques Demy (The World of Jacques Demy) (1995). It combines interviews with Demy's film collaborators, archival behind the scenes footage of the making of Demy's movies, and rich clips from Demy's films. The work is delightful. It is one of Varda's most informative documentaries, and anticipates The Gleaners and I to come. Both star Varda as narrator; both involve travel to various locations, and both interview a lot of colorful and interesting people, to explore every possible, varied aspect of their subject.
Many guests are color-coordinated with their backgrounds: a Varda tradition. Nino Castelnuovo (who can still sing his role in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg!) is in a dark red shirt that exactly matches the woodwork behind him. This segment also has ordinary people singing the music to this film. Later, in The Gleaners and I, the family picking grapes will sing as they work.
The film opens with a woman reading an open letter in memory of Demy. She forms a pink triangle, with her blonde hair forming the apex of the triangle, and matching her pink outfit. Soon, Anouk Aimée will form a black triangle, with her black hair extended by her black suit. These colorful triangles are a Varda specialty: triangles whose base is horizontal, with two sides sloping towards a peak above. Both women contrast with Varda herself, who will soon enter the film in green. Later on Harrison Ford will be seen in long shot, in which a large wooden rail fence forms a triangle, while other rails and posts make up the repeated elements Varda likes in her compositions.
Behind Aimée, a couch forms a hooked curve. So does the chair behind producer Mag Bodard. Other guests in the film will be on couches with wavy-lined backs.
The strong vertical and horizontal lines Varda likes are behind many of the interviewees, formed by tables, shelves (the horizontals) or doors, windows (the verticals). The verticals are sometimes linked to bright color schemes, such as red-and-green, or the red-and-blue behind Varda when she talks about Hollywood calling. The red-and-blue windows composition also includes a slanting, slim tree trunk, which makes more triangles.
Varda pulls out all the stops at the Fair, in a virtuoso sequence. The Fair is the sort of "unusual place full of large-scale machines and technology", that we will later see in the agricultural operations in The Gleaners and I.
The arched, hooked curve lines we have seen before in chair backs, are now echoed by a whirligig structure, we see in both the opening and closing shots of the sequence. There are many arched lines around a central "head": a Varda "repeating structure" shot.
The staircase we see in the opening and closing shots looks a bit like the staircase outside the judge's courtroom in The Gleaners and I. Both giant, public staircases have an "official" look, which contrasts greatly in tone with the fairground machines.
A shot shows sailors and their girlfriends, in white, blue and red, against blue, red and white walls near a fairground entrance. These are a typical Varda "wall shot", filled with glowing, coordinated colors.
A man tries to hit a bag, in front of a long arcade. These are like the outdoor market sequences in The Gleaners and I, which also feature long arcades.
Varda, like Fritz Lang, likes still lifes of objects. Varda tends to pile flat, rectangular objects on each other: papers, photos, drawings. This gives a two-dimensional quality to the compositions. A memorable still life near the opening combines this with a flat, rectangular music box. This shallow box is just a little thicker than the rest of the flat papers on which it is sitting.
The still lifes here are of Demy's memorabilia and papers. Those in The Gleaners and I to come will be of Varda's own papers and souvenirs.
In principle, everyone knows about farms. In practice, most modern people in industrialized countries have little first hand experience with farms. Varda takes her camera to many actual farming locations. It is fascinating to see what a potato or cabbage farm actually looks like - it is subtly different from what one might expect. The commercial oyster beds Varda displays are also visually fascinating. Recently, the News Hour with Jim Lehrer went to the Land of Lakes dairy processing facility in Central California for a report (2001). The huge plant looked utterly unlike anything I might have imagined, and the report is a mini-classic at showing a world we have never seen. One also recalls Lawrence G. Blochman's Recipe for Homicide (1952), a mystery novel with a background of industrial food processing. This is a whole invisible world. Varda is on to something different and important here.
The water faucet in the middle of nowhere in the countryside recalls the pump in Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond.
Varda's film hits on a mix that was once widely used in photojournalism. Magazines such as Life featured gifted contemporary artists, interesting social trends, ordinary folks doing unusual but constructive things, back stage looks at commercial institutions (such as food processing or restaurants), all presented to the public in gorgeous photographs. Life was informational, showing interesting parts of the world that were not quite news. Life did not feature advice (such as how to improve your marriage, protect your health, or make appealing meals), it was not oriented to celebrity gossip, and its non-news aspect tended to keep it distinct from news coverage. Varda, by accident or design, has almost exactly recreated this old format. The public used to be fascinated by Life, and its imitators such as Look. Such "general information" magazines have lost their central place in public esteem today, and little has really come to take their place. The media tends instead to offer celebrities, politics (often very right wing), financial news or advice. A whole dimension has been lost. In 1960, ordinary Americans learned about artists in Life. They would read profiles of abstract expressionists or Pop artists, and see color photos of their works. These photos would be in Life, which went into a large percentage of ordinary American homes. It is unclear that anything like this is happening today. Artists have become invisible in America. A standard mechanism that used to present them has broken down.
Society is poorer today for this change. Ordinary people were more integrated into what might be called culture. Many Americans today tend to be plugged into political propaganda such as Fox News or right wing talk radio. This is a long way down from Life.
Another key aspect of Life. As far as I can tell, people read Life without being prompted to buy it through advertising. Similarly, American kids bought 100 million comic books per month, during their peak of popularity in the 1950's, without any prompting from advertising at all. Today, in the new millennium, Americans seem almost entirely oriented toward interfacing with the world through advertisements.
The Gleaners and I shows Varda's personal sense of color. Scenes show the bright, brilliant colors that are today called neon. Varda is unafraid to mix several bright colors. The vibrating color harmonies that are produced can be spectacular. The other filmmaker that one associates with neon colors is Storm De Hirsch: see, for example, her Peyote Queen (1965). Like Varda, Hirsch was an independent woman filmmaker who pursued a non-standard vision through her works.
The people interviewed by Varda tend to wear clothes that match the backgrounds. If someone is in a field full of yellow, they wear a bright yellow sweatshirt. The two men after the potato harvest who talk about the return of gleaning wear blue clothes, matching the blue trucks behind them. The man in front of the gray silos wears a gray sweater. Not only does its color match, but its texture recalls the ribbed silos behind him. The silos have conical roofs, that recall Varda's love of triangles. These triangles are contrasted Varda-style with the horizontal line running between the silos, and their vertical sides. And of course there are two silos: Varda loves repeating structures.
Varda often constructs her scenes through strong vertical lines. Such lines are found outdoors in fences, building and trucks. These lines tend to bound regions of glowing color. At the base of the image tend to be horizontal regions, parts of the ground, grass and sidewalks.
Varda is fascinated by the brilliant red potato sorting machinery. This is full of repeating lines. The potatoes pour through. The Gleaners and I is full of motion. It celebrates life, and is more dynamic than the frozen winter footage of Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond. When the first truck dumps the potatoes, we see a composition that includes both the rectangles of the truck, and three matching trapezoids: the mound of potatoes below the truck, a trapezoidal structure on the top of the truck, and a car in the upper right corner. The three trapezoids, the strong rectangles formed by the rest of the truck, and motion of the potatoes form a striking composition. Once again, Varda shoots dead on, building up a 2D image out of strong geometric regions, creatively arranged.
The causeway to the oyster island forms a giant triangle, but one whose sides curve in towards the base. Towards the right, there is a mound forming a second, smaller triangle: a Varda echoing. Aside from the curves, these are both Varda triangles, with their base a horizontal line near the bottom of the screen.
We soon see a man with a series of trapezoidal containers behind him, which apparently contain oysters.
And a little later in the oyster sequence, a man in a yellow overall stands in front of some truck-like machinery, who cab forms a series of strong diagonal lines in parallel behind him. This is balanced against some horizontals, plus a cylinder of machinery on the left.
Much of the oyster episode involves "themes and variations". We see every sort of bucket used to carry the oysters: rectangular, cylindrical, truncated conical pairs, and all sorts of colors and material. And with different shaped slots out of which water runs. It is a sort of essay on all the different shaped buckets in the world. Similarly, the people wear every sort of different rubberized clothing, from overalls to slickers and boots. There is also a surreal shot of rubber gloves standing up on a shelf, which shows the variety of gloves available. And we see the lines of the oyster beds from many angles, perspectives and distances. Varda loves to provide this sort of varied detail.
Varda is into her echoing effects. A striking shot has Varda as a gleaner on the left, imitating Jules Breton's painting of a gleaner on the right. Varda is smaller than the painting, so the familiar change of scale in Varda's repeating objects is present. The two rectangles of the painting and the rug in front of which Varda stands make interestingly arranged rectangles on the screen. A wrought iron raining below adds a third rectangle to the composition.
The fields full of potatoes also make striking compositions. The potatoes are some of Varda's "repeating objects". Here they occur in great quantities, by the hundreds. Varda likes to make images of such objects arranged into complex patterns.
The judge standing in the field is also in the midst of dozens of repeating plants. The visual repetition of the plants recalls the wall paper patterns loved by Varda in Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond. His red law book will echo the tomatoes. Varda has a beautiful shot, showing the judge in front of the cabbages. Once again, Varda shoots head on, and different regions make rectangles on the screen. The tall plants where the judge is standing make one rectangle; the cabbages in front make a second rectangle. Varda pans down, towards the cabbages. Such pans down toward a forward region also occur in Sans toit ni loi / Vagabond.
The chronographs, pictures created by Étienne-Jules Marey that show dozens of images of a person or animal in motion, taken in time sequence, are ancestors to Varda's repeating elements. Varda includes some fascinating examples, during her trip to the Marey museum.
Varda makes beautiful still lifes of her souvenirs of Japan. These include both rectangles and circular elements. They launch a series of episodes on art. The fungus is compared to the style of various artists, and we see "found object" and "junk" artists and their environments.
Varda made an hour-long follow-up to The Gleaners and I, Two Years Later (2002). Both films are available on the same DVD. Varda's film was a hit in France, and Two Years After documents some of its impact.
In Two Years Later, we meet many of the participants from the first film, and learn more about them. The effect is somewhat like Vagabond. In Vagabond, the characters appear and disappear, throughout the movie. We often see a little bit about a person, and then learn more about them later. The exposition proceeds by a strange web-work effect, with later sections expanding on earlier ones. It also helps to see Vagabond twice or more: one gets more out of the early scenes with the characters, if we know some of their background that only gets filled in later.
This film also briefly recalls Jacquot de Nantes: it has clips of one of Demy's childhood animated films (very charming in color) and of a salvaging section of Varda's Documenteur, proving that Varda's interest in the subject of gleaning dates back over 20 years.